OPTN/SRTR 2021 Annual Data Report: Heart
Monica M. Colvin1,2, Jodi M. Smith1,3, Yoon Son Ahn1, Eric Messick4, Kelsi Lindblad4, Ajay K. Israni1,5,6, Jon J. Snyder1,5,6, Bertram L. Kasiske1,6
1Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN
2Department of Cardiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
3Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
4Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA
5Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
6Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Abstract
The past 5 years have posed challenges to the field of heart transplantation. The 2018 heart allocation policy revision was accompanied by anticipated practice adjustments and increased use of short-term circulatory support, changes that may ultimately serve to advance the field. The COVID-19 pandemic also had an impact on heart transplantation. While the number of heart transplants in the United States continued to increase, the number of new candidates decreased slightly during the pandemic. There were slightly more deaths following removal from the waiting list for reasons other than transplant during 2020, and a decline in transplants among candidates listed as status 1, 2, or 3 compared with the other statuses. Heart transplant rates decreased among pediatric candidates, most notably among those younger than 1 year. Despite this, pretransplant mortality has declined for both pediatric and adult candidates, particularly candidates younger than 1 year. Transplant rates have increased in adults. The prevalence of ventricular assist device use has increased among pediatric heart transplant recipients, while the prevalence of short-term mechanical circulatory support, particularly intra-aortic balloon pump and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, has increased among adult recipients.
Keywords: Allocation, donor, heart failure, heart transplant, left ventricular assist device, mechanical circulatory support, outcomes
1 INTRODUCTION
Heart transplantation continues to provide selected patients with advanced heart failure substantially better quality of life and survival than left ventricular assist devices, the only other viable therapy for patients with stage D heart failure. Donor availability, disparities in access, and optimal risk stratification remain challenges. As we enter the fifth year of the 2018 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) heart allocation policy, it is apparent that heart allocation practices have shifted toward the use of short-term mechanical circulatory support, the most expeditious route for heart transplant. The Annual Data Report provides an evaluation of trends in US adult and pediatric heart transplant waiting lists, donation, transplants, and outcomes. Although data following the policy change are available, inherent differences in calculations during 2018 should be considered when assessing rates and other data obtained during that year (ie, data for 2018 should be interpreted with caution). An additional consideration is that when the new policy took effect on October 18, 2018, new statuses were assigned to candidates who remained on the waiting list. Because these candidates were only counted under the newly assigned statuses, the number of candidates who were awaiting transplant under the prior statuses (1A, 1B, or 2) may be lower or greater than expected in 2018.
2 ADULT HEART TRANSPLANT
2.1 Waiting List
Despite successful medical therapies for heart failure, the number of new heart transplant candidates continues to grow. The COVID-19 pandemic had a small impact on new listings. Following a plateau in 2018 through 2020, with a slight decrease in 2020 (from 4,087 in 2019 to 4,000 in 2020), the number of new listings increased to 4,373 in 2021, the largest increase in the past decade (Figure HR 1). The number of candidates prevalent on the list increased 32.3% from 2010 through 2016, peaking at 7,684 candidates, then declined from 2018 through 2020, likely due to higher transplant rates and fewer listings during the COVID-19 pandemic (Figure HR 2). Although the largest age group on the waiting list in 2021 was 50-64 years, there has been a gradual decrease in this age group since 2010. Candidates aged 65 years or older made up 20.4% of the list in 2021, an increase from 16.5% in 2010. Trends among other age groups have been stable since 2016 (Figure HR 3). Sex distribution remains relatively constant, with women constituting 24.9% in 2021 (Figure HR 4). There has been an increasing prevalence of non-White candidates. White candidates decreased from 69.4% in 2010 to 57.9% in 2021, while Black candidates increased from 20.4% to 27.4% and Hispanic candidates (includes candidates who are categorized as White and Hispanic or solely Hispanic) increased from 7.0% to 10.1%. Asian candidates have similarly increased, making up 3.6% of candidates in 2021 (Figure HR 5).
Coronary artery disease has become a less common primary diagnosis for heart transplant, and cardiomyopathy remains the most common diagnosis for heart transplant. In 2021, only 28.6% of all candidates, compared with 38.2% in 2010, were listed for coronary artery disease. Despite a change in allocation policy that provides a status for candidates with congenital heart disease, listings for congenital heart disease were infrequent, 4.7% in 2021, and overall stable since 2010. Listings for valvular heart disease are rare, 1.1% in 2021 (Figure HR 6).
Prior to the new policy, the proportion of candidates who were listed as status 2 declined from 2010 through 2017, whereas that of candidates listed as status 1A continued to gradually increase and candidates listed as status 1B reached a plateau (Figure HR 8). Following implementation of the new policy, most candidates were listed as status 4 (28.9% in 2021), followed by status 2 (24.7% in 2021). A major concern regarding the policy change was the potential increase in patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and subsequently in status 1 listings. As anticipated, status 1 listings have increased since 2019; 5.5% of candidates were awaiting transplant as status 1 in 2021 (Figure HR 9). It is anticipated that this trend will continue.
While the age and sex of the typical heart transplant candidate in 2021 have not changed compared with 2011, there are substantially more Black and Hispanic candidates (Table HR 1), fewer with coronary artery disease, more with ventricular assist devices (VADs) (Table HR 2), and fewer who reside 150 miles or farther from the transplant center (Table HR 1).
2.2 Transplant Rates
Overall transplant rates were stable until 2016, after which there was a steady increase to 106.2 transplants per 100 patient-years in 2021, the highest rate this past decade (Figure HR 13). A similar trend was seen among all groups (excluding statuses), with the greatest 10-year increases occurring in candidates with the following attributes: aged 65 years or older, White, congenital heart disease, blood type B, female, and height of 150-<160 cm. Overall transplant rates increased 37.7% since 2017; however, marked increases (49.2% or greater) occurred among candidates aged 65 years or older, who are Asian or Hispanic, who have congenital heart disease or coronary artery disease, with blood type AB or B, and who are 150-<160 cm tall. Candidates in metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas have had similar transplant rates. Candidates aged 35-49 years, 180 cm or taller, Black candidates, those with congenital heart disease, and those of blood type O undergo transplant at substantially lower rates than others in their categories. Candidates with congenital heart disease continue to undergo transplant markedly slower than those with other diagnoses, 80.6 transplants per 100 patient-years, and slower than all other subgroups assessed in this report except blood group O, 72.7 transplants per 100 patient-years (Figures HR 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, and 22).
It was anticipated that under the revised policy, transplant rates would increase, particularly among the highest-urgency candidates. Rates calculated during 2018 must be interpreted with caution due to variations created by relisting under new statuses and variations in exposure times for all statuses compared with 2017 and 2019. For this reason, 2018 will be excluded in this evaluation, although the data are available in the supporting information file (F19 and F20 tabs). Prior to the policy change, transplant rates among status 1A and 1B candidates reached a nadir of 212 and 66 transplants per 100 patient-years, respectively, in 2014, after which rates began to increase again. Status 2 transplant rates steadily declined until 2015 (Figure HR 19). Among the new status categories, transplant rates have fluctuated since 2019. As anticipated, the highest-urgency candidates undergo transplant the fastest: in 2021, status 1 candidates underwent transplant at a rate of 1,491.6 transplants per 100 patient-years; status 2, 1,069.7 per 100 patient-years; and status 3, 253.2 per 100 patient-years. Status 4 candidates have a much slower rate of transplant (73.3 transplants per 100 patient-years) followed by statuses 6 and 5 (62.9 and 49.6 transplants per 100 patient-years, respectively). A small proportion of adult patients were assigned to the pediatric listing statuses after October 18, 2018 (Figure HR 20). The transplant rates of these candidates fluctuated following the policy change.
Among adults listed for heart transplant during 2016-2018, 56.2% had undergone transplant by 1 year, 27.8% were still waiting, 5.0% died, and 11.0% had been removed. By 3 years, 66.7% had undergone transplant, 7.8% were still waiting, 6.3% died, and 19.2% had been removed (Figure HR 23). Candidates who underwent transplant within 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year of listing have increased since 2010 after reaching a nadir in 2014. There was a marked increase following the policy change, and, in 2020, 54% of candidates underwent transplant within 3 months of listing. Still, close to 30% of candidates have not undergone transplant by years 5 and 10 (Figure HR 24). The number of patients remaining on the waiting list at end of year has decreased from 2019 through 2021, despite increasing numbers being added because of an increase in donors and subsequently increased transplant rates (Table HR 4). More patients were removed for transplant or death in 2021 compared with 2019, and fewer were removed due to being too ill for transplant (Table HR 5).
2.3 Pretransplant Mortality
Following a plateau in 2010-2015, the overall pretransplant mortality rate declined 39.4% from 14.2 deaths per 100 patient-years in 2015 to 8.5 deaths per 100 patient-years in 2019 (Figure HR 25). Since then, the pretransplant mortality rate has been stable and was 8.6 deaths per 100 patient-years in 2021. There was a downward trajectory for all ages, races and ethnicities, sexes, and residential settings (metropolitan vs non-metropolitan). Candidates whose race was categorized as other had wide fluctuations in pretransplant mortality, with a peak of 40.9 deaths per 100 patient-years in 2017; however, this may be a spurious value and due to a small sample size (Figure HR 27). Candidates aged 18-34 years had a large decline in pretransplant mortality and now have the lowest mortality rate of all age groups: 6.5 deaths per 100 patient-years in 2021. Pretransplant mortality in candidates aged 65 years or older has declined but remains slightly higher than in other age groups: 11.1 deaths per 100 patient-years in 2021 (Figure HR 26). Among the diagnoses, there were wide fluctuations in pretransplant mortality among candidates with congenital heart disease and valvular heart disease. Valvular heart disease and other (as diagnosis) tend to have higher pretransplant mortality relative to other diagnoses. Despite having the lowest transplant rate of the diagnosis groups, patients with congenital heart disease also tend to have the lowest pretransplant mortality (Figure HR 29). Although pretransplant rates have been similar between candidates residing in metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas, since 2017 pretransplant mortality has trended slightly higher among candidates who reside in non-metropolitan areas (Figure HR 30).
Due to the aforementioned characteristics of rate calculations by status in 2018, the year 2018 will be excluded from this assessment of pretransplant mortality trends by status even though it is shown in the graphs (Figures HR 31 and 32). The pretransplant mortality of temporarily inactive candidates gradually declined since 2015. Among active candidates, those listed at the highest-urgency status tend to have the highest pretransplant mortality, both before and after the updated heart allocation policy. Under the prior policy, there was substantial decline in pretransplant mortality from 2010 through 2017 for status 1A and 1B candidates: 59.2% and 56.2%, respectively. There was little change in pretransplant mortality for candidates listed as status 2 under the prior system (Figure HR 31). Under the new system, candidates listed as status 1 have a markedly higher pretransplant mortality rate compared with other statuses; following a peak of 127.3 deaths per 100 patient-years in 2020 (excluding 2018), pretransplant mortality for status 1 candidates declined to 70.7 deaths per 100 patient-years in 2021. A similar trend was seen among status 2 candidates: 43.7 deaths per 100 patient-years in 2021. Candidates listed as status 3 had the third highest pretransplant mortality (among active listings): 17.4 deaths per 100 patient-years in 2021 (Figure HR 32). Despite broader sharing under the new heart allocation policy, there remains wide geographic variability in pretransplant mortality. Two donation service areas (DSAs) had pretransplant mortality of 0 and one DSA had a pretransplant mortality of 46.2 in 2021. Variability in pretransplant mortality rates may reflect center-specific practices and differences in patient selection, in addition to geographic variability in access (Figure HR 33).
The percentage of candidates who died within 6 months of removal from the waiting list for reasons other than transplant or death has declined from 27.9% in 2010 to 12.5% in 2021 (Figure HR 34). The trend persisted across age groups, although there was a slight increase over the past 5 years for the oldest age group (65 years or older). Candidates aged 50-64 years had a marked decline compared with other age groups, despite having had the highest mortality after removal for several years. Candidates aged 50-64 years have a comparable distribution of mortality to candidates aged 18-34 years (Figure HR 35). Prior to the policy change, there was a clear decline in mortality within 6 months of removal from the waiting list for reasons other than transplant or death; however, trends are less clear among the new statuses. Since 2019, there appears to have been an increase in mortality after removal for candidates listed as statuses 1, 2, or 6 and no change to a slight decrease for statuses 3 and 5, although, if we compare with 2018, there was a decline in mortality for all statuses except status 6. There was a noticeable decline in mortality for status 4 candidates, from 16.2% in 2019 to 5.3% in 2021. More time is required to fully assess trends in mortality after removal (Figure HR 36).
2.4 Donation
Despite the pandemic, the number of donors from whom a heart was recovered continued to increase, especially among the age groups 18-29 and 30-39 years. In 2021, 3,901 hearts were recovered for transplant (Figure HR 37). Most donors continue to be aged 18-29 years (35.1%) and 30-39 years (29.8%) (Figure HR 38). Pediatric donors and donors aged 55 years or older declined to a nadir of 13.4% and 1.8%, respectively (Figure HR 39). There are slightly fewer female donors compared with 2010; racial and ethnic distribution remains unchanged (Figures HR 40 and 41). Hearts recovered for transplant from donors who died from anoxia has steadily increased over the past decade, with no change between 2020 and 2021. Death from anoxia is the most common cause of death for donors, 45.0% in 2021, followed by head trauma, 40.8% (Figure HR 42).
The proportion of hearts recovered for transplant but not transplanted remains low, and in 2021, the rate of nonuse was 1.02% (Figure HR 43). There were similar trends seen by age, sex, race, hypertension status, body mass index (BMI), donor cause of death, and donor risk, with an overall increase over the past decade (Figures HR 44, 46, 47, 48, 49, and 50). In 2021, all hearts from Asian and pediatric donors were used. Nonuse was highest among donors with the following attributes: aged 30-39 years (1.7%), male (1.2%), hypertension (1.9%), BMI 40 kg/m2 or greater (4.3%), cerebrovascular accident/stroke (1.7%), or other/unknown cause of death (2.3%) (Figures HR 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, and 49). Hearts from donors with hypertension were not used at twice the rate of those from donors without hypertension. Despite the trends among heart donors, rates of nonuse are extremely low compared with other organ groups.
2.5 Transplants
The upward trajectory in the number of heart transplants continued despite the COVID-19 pandemic. Heart transplants increased 67.4% from 2010 to 2021 (Figure HR 51). Increases were seen across all ages, sexes, races and ethnicities, and causes of heart failure except valvular heart disease, which declined to 22 transplants in 2021 (Figure HR 55). Notably, recipients aged 65 years or older increased 127.0%, from 322 in 2010 to 731 in 2021 (Figure HR 52). From 2010 to 2021, the numbers of Asian and Hispanic recipients increased 146.9% and 149.3%, respectively (Figure HR 54). When compared with adult heart transplant recipients in 2011, adult recipients in 2021 were older, more often male, and more often White, although there were more non-Whites than in 2011. The prevalence of recipients with Medicaid as the primary payer increased from 9.8% to 14.4% (Table HR 7). In general, adult recipients received a heart transplant for cardiomyopathy and were most likely to have blood type O or A. Fifty-nine percent of patients had calculated panel-reactive antibody < 20% in 2021; however, this value was missing for 28.2% of recipients, a marked increase from 3.3% missingness in panel-reactive antibody in 2011 (Table HR 8).
The number of recipients who received a transplant as status 1A increased from 2010 to 2017, whereas the number of status 2 recipients declined. In 2018, there was a decline in status 1A and 1B recipients, but an increase in status 2 recipients. The number of transplants under the new statuses is expectedly low in 2018; however, from 2019 through 2021, there was an increase in transplants among all statuses except 3, 4, and 5. In 2021, recipients were most often status 2 (50.2%) at the time of transplant, followed by status 4 (18.8%). In 2020, some centers elected to perform transplant in only the highest-urgency candidates due to the pandemic; however, heart transplants among status 1, 2, and 3 recipients declined nationwide and increased among the other statuses during 2020 compared with 2019 (Figure HR 56). Waiting times may be decreasing. Compared with 2011, more patients in 2021 underwent transplant within 90 days of listing (63.5%), and fewer waited 3 months to <2 years (Table HR 9). Trends in life support continue with an increasing prevalence of short-term devices. The number of patients with any life support increased, although the proportion declined from 81.9% in 2018 to 76.3% in 2021. In 2021, fewer patients had left ventricular assist devices before transplant (31.4%), while the prevalence of intra-aortic balloon use increased to 27.6% from 9.4% in 2018. ECMO prior to transplant also increased more than 3-fold (Table HR 6).
The use of induction therapy has varied over time. In 2013 through 2018, there was slightly more use of induction therapy, but this has declined again. In 2021, 49.0% of recipients received induction therapy (Figure HR 57). Triple immunosuppressive therapy (ie, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil [MMF], and steroids) is the most common regimen at the time of transplant, and its use has increased from 73.3% to 83.9% from 2010 to 2021. The use of only tacrolimus and MMF also increased slightly to 8.0% in 2021 (Figure HR 58).
2.6 Outcomes
Six-month and 1-year mortality trends have fluctuated slightly since 2010 but remained constant in 2020. Six-month mortality peaked at 8.8% in 2014 and reached a nadir of 6.5% in 2018. One-year mortality was lowest at 7.9% in 2018 and peaked at 10.8% in 2014. In the transplant year 2020, 6-month mortality was 7.4%. One-year mortality followed a similar trend and in 2020 was 9.2%. Both 3-year and 5-year mortality have declined (Figure HR 59). Five-year survival is comparable between age groups. During the first year of transplant, candidates aged 65 years or older had the greatest decrease in survival, 11.8% (Figure HR 60). Hispanic recipients had an early decline in survival from 99.7% to 88.0% in the first year, while recipients categorized as other race and ethnicity tended to have a slight survival advantage throughout 5 years (Figure HR 61).
Survival varied by cause of heart failure. Recipients with valvular heart disease and other/unknown cause tended to have better survival throughout the first 4 years of transplant, whereas candidates with congenital heart disease had the lowest survival. Survival declined early among recipients with congenital heart disease to 88.7% at 3 months compared with >90% in other categories. This trend persisted, and at 5 years survival was 74.3% in recipients with congenital heart disease, the lowest of the diagnosis groups (Figure HR 62). Recipients with VADs had lower survival at 5 years than those without VADs (78.4% vs 82.3%, respectively), with curves separating at approximately 6 months (Figure HR 64). Recipients who received a heart transplant as status 2 in 2014-2016 (prior policy) had an early decrease in survival compared with statuses 1A and 1B; by 5 years, survival for status 2 recipients was 75.5% compared with 82.1% for status 1B and 79.9% for status 1A (Figure HR 65). Five-year survival did not vary by sex or place of residence (Figures HR 63 and 66).
The incidence of acute rejection at 1-year posttransplant has not changed appreciably over the past decade and occurred in 31.8% of 18- to 34-year old recipients who received a transplant in 2020 and in 18.6% of recipients aged 65 years or older (Figure HR 67). The cumulative incidence of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder at 5 years remains constant, 1.1%, occurring 3 times more frequently among recipients who are Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) seronegative (Figure HR 68).
3 PEDIATRIC HEART TRANSPLANT
3.1 Pediatric Waitlist Trends
In 2021, 703 new pediatric candidates were added to the heart transplant waiting list, and a total of 1,146 candidates aged 17 years or younger were awaiting heart transplant, which is a 39.8% increase from 2010 (Figures HR 69 and 70). The largest pediatric age groups on the waiting list in 2021 were 1-5 years (26.4%) and 12-17 years (28.4%), followed by younger than 1 year (21.3%) and 6-11 years (18.0%) (Figure HR 71). Just over half of pediatric heart transplant candidates were White (51.3%), 21.0% were Hispanic, 19.6% were Black, and 4.2% were Asian (Figure HR 72). Congenital defects continued to be the leading diagnosis among pediatric heart transplant candidates, at 57.3% in 2021, an increase of 23.7% since 2010 (Figure HR 73). Over the past decade, the proportion of candidates who were White has decreased from 58.5% in 2011 to 49.3% in 2021 (Table HR 10). For candidates waiting on December 31, 2021, congenital defect was the leading cause of heart disease, at 64.1%, compared with 46.3% in 2011 (Table HR 11). The proportion of candidates listed with a VAD increased from 3.8% in 2011 to 8.5% in 2021 (Table HR 11). Among the 661 candidates removed from the waiting list in 2021, 505 (76.4%) were removed due to undergoing transplant, 46 (7.0%) died, 40 (6.1%) were removed due to improved condition, and 33 (5.0%) were considered too sick to undergo transplant (Tables HR 13 and 14).
In 2021, 40.7% of pediatric heart transplant candidates on the waiting list had been waiting for fewer than 90 days (Figure HR 75). Almost half (48.2%) of these were status 1A candidates in 2021, followed by 18% status 1B and 11.0% status 2 (Figure HR 76). Just over 70% of pediatric candidates newly listed during 2016-2018 underwent transplant within 3 years, 10.1% died, 15.0% were removed from the list, and 4.6% were still waiting (Figure HR 77). After decreasing to its lowest rate in the past decade in 2020 (107.7 transplants per 100 patient-years), the pediatric heart transplant rate in 2021 increased to 113.0 transplants per 100 patient-years (Figure HR 78). Transplant rates in 2021 varied by age, with the highest rates for candidates aged 12-17 years (166.7 transplants per 100 patient-years), followed by younger than 1 year (161.8 transplants per 100 patient-years), 6-11 years (105.5 transplants per 100 patient-years), and 1-5 years (65.4 transplants per 100 patient-years) (Figure HR 79). Transplant rates in 2021 were similar among pediatric waitlist candidates by race (Figure HR 80). The pretransplant mortality decreased by 50.2%, from 21.9 deaths per 100 patient-years in 2010 to 10.9 deaths per 100 patient-years in 2021 (Figure HR 82). Pretransplant mortality rates in 2021 varied by age, with the highest rates in candidates younger than 1 year, at 29.8 deaths per 100 patient-years, followed by 8.7 for ages 1-5 years, 8.3 for 12-17 years, and 1.1 for 6-11 years (Figure HR 83). Looking at pretransplant mortality by race in 2021, rates were 12.4 deaths per 100 patient-years among Black candidates, 11.9 deaths per 100 patient-years among Hispanic candidates, 10.7 deaths per 100 patient-years among White candidates, and 5.2 deaths per 100 patient-years among Asian candidates (Figure HR 84). Pretransplant mortality in 2021 was highest for status 1A (30.1 deaths per 100 patient-years) candidates followed by status 1B (5.8 deaths per 100 patient-years) and status 2 (4.2 deaths per 100 patient-years) candidates among active statuses (Figure HR 86). Pretransplant mortality rates were similar for heart transplant candidates listed in metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas in 2021 (Figure HR 87).
3.2 Pediatric Trends in Heart Transplant
The number of pediatric heart transplants performed increased to 490 in 2021, a 36.1% increase from 2010 (Figure HR 88). There were 184 (37.6%) heart transplants performed in recipients aged 12-17 years, 111 (22.7%) in recipients younger than 1 year, 107 (21.8%) in recipients aged 1-5 years, and 88 (18.0%) in recipients aged 6-11 years (Figure HR 89). Over the past few years, the proportion of transplant recipients aged 12-17 years has increased (30.5% in 2016 compared with 37.6% in 2021) (Table HR 16). Sex, as well as race and ethnicity, of pediatric heart transplant recipients has remained stable (Table HR 16). Just over half of pediatric heart transplant recipients in 2021 had congenital defect as their primary cause of disease (Table HR 17). The proportion who underwent transplant at status 1A declined from 89.3% in 2011 to 81.8% in 2021, while the proportion at status 1B increased from 6.9% to 16.7% and the proportion at status 2 declined from 3.7% to 1.4%. The proportion of heart transplant recipients with a VAD at transplant increased by 89.9%, from 18.9% in 2011 to 35.9% in 2021 (Table HR 17). The proportion of ABO-incompatible transplants has increased from 3.7% in 2011 to 8.6% in 2021 (Table HR 18).
Over the past decade, induction therapy use has increased, to 84.9% of pediatric heart transplant recipients in 2021 (Figure HR 94). The initial immunosuppression regimens used most commonly in 2021 were tacrolimus, MMF, and steroids in 48.8% of pediatric heart transplant recipients (Figure HR 95). There has been a steady increase in the use of a tacrolimus and MMF regimen, to almost 40% in 2021 (Figure HR 95).
3.3 Pediatric Posttransplant Survival and Morbidity
Among pediatric heart transplant recipients in 2020, the rate of acute rejection in the first year was 23.0% in recipients aged 1-5 years, 19.9% in those aged 12-17 years, 16.1% in those younger than 1 year, and 13.0% in those aged 6-11 years (Figure HR 96).
Recipient death occurred in 4.7% of patients at 6-months posttransplant and in 6.9% at 1-year posttransplant among pediatric heart transplants performed in 2020, in 13.1% at 3 years for transplants performed in 2018, in 13.7% at 5 years for transplants performed in 2016, and in 31.5% at 10 years for transplants performed in 2011 (Figure HR 98). Overall, 1- and 5-year patient survival rates were 92.7% and 84.3%, respectively, among recipients who underwent transplant in 2014-2016 (Figure HR 99). By age, 5-year patient survival was 82.2% for recipients younger than 1 year, 83.4% for those aged 1-5 years, 88.0% for those aged 6-11 years, and 84.9% for those aged 12-17 years (Figure HR 100).
Among pediatric heart transplant recipients in 2010-2016, the overall incidence of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder was 4.7% at 5 years; incidence was 6.1% among EBV-negative recipients and 3.3% among EBV-positive recipients (Figure HR 97).
This publication was produced for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), by Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute (HHRI) and the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) under contracts HHSH75R60220C00011 and HHSH250201900001C, respectively.
This publication lists nonfederal resources in order to provide additional information to consumers. The views and content in these resources have not been formally approved by HHS or HRSA. Neither HHS nor HRSA endorses the products or services of the listed resources.
The OPTN/SRTR 2021 Annual Data Report is not copyrighted. Readers are free to duplicate and use all or part of the information contained in this publication. Data are not copyrighted and may be used without permission if appropriate citation information is provided.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1320b-10, this publication may not be reproduced, reprinted, or redistributed for a fee without specific written authorization from HHS.
Suggested Citations:
Full citation: Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) and Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR). OPTN/SRTR 2021 Annual Data Report. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration; 2023. Accessed [insert date]. http://srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov/annual_reports/Default.aspx
Abbreviated citation: OPTN/SRTR 2021 Annual Data Report. HHS/HRSA; 2023. Accessed [insert date]. http://srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov/annual_reports/Default.aspx
Publications based on data in this report or supplied on request must include a citation and the following statement: The data and analyses reported in the OPTN/SRTR 2021 Annual Data Report have been supplied by the United Network for Organ Sharing and Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute under contract with HHS/HRSA. The authors alone are responsible for reporting and interpreting these data; the views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the U.S. government.
This report is available at https://srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov. Individual chapters may be downloaded.
List of Figures
- Figure HR 1: New adult candidates added to the heart transplant waiting list
- Figure HR 2: All adult candidates on the heart transplant waiting list
- Figure HR 3: Distribution of adults waiting for heart transplant by age
- Figure HR 4: Distribution of adults waiting for heart transplant by sex
- Figure HR 5: Distribution of adults waiting for heart transplant by race
- Figure HR 6: Distribution of adults waiting for heart transplant by diagnosis
- Figure HR 7: Distribution of adults waiting for heart transplant by waiting time
- Figure HR 8: Distribution of adults waiting for heart transplant by former medical urgency groups through October 17, 2018
- Figure HR 9: Distribution of adults waiting for heart transplant by new medical urgency groups, October 18, 2018, through 2021
- Figure HR 10: Distribution of adults waiting for heart transplant by BMI
- Figure HR 11: Distribution of adults waiting for heart transplant by blood type
- Figure HR 12: Distribution of adults waiting for heart transplant by prior transplant status
- Figure HR 13: Overall deceased donor heart transplant rates among adult waitlist candidates
- Figure HR 14: Deceased donor heart transplant rates among adult waitlist candidates by age
- Figure HR 15: Deceased donor heart transplant rates among adult waitlist candidates by race
- Figure HR 16: Deceased donor heart transplant rates among adult waitlist candidates by diagnosis
- Figure HR 17: Deceased donor heart transplant rates among adult waitlist candidates by blood type
- Figure HR 18: Deceased donor heart transplant rates among adult waitlist candidates by sex
- Figure HR 19: Deceased donor heart transplant rates among adult waitlist candidates by former medical urgency groups through October 17, 2018
- Figure HR 20: Deceased donor heart transplant rates among adult waitlist candidates by new medical urgency groups, October 18, 2018, through 2021
- Figure HR 21: Deceased donor heart transplant rates among adult waitlist candidates by height
- Figure HR 22: Deceased donor heart transplant rates among adult waitlist candidates by metropolitan vs. non-metropolitan residence
- Figure HR 23: Three-year outcomes for adults waiting for heart transplant, new listings in 2016-2018
- Figure HR 24: Percentage of adults who underwent deceased donor heart transplant within a given period of listing
- Figure HR 25: Overall pretransplant mortality rates among adults waitlisted for heart transplant
- Figure HR 26: Pretransplant mortality rates among adults waitlisted for heart transplant by age
- Figure HR 27: Pretransplant mortality rates among adults waitlisted for heart transplant by race
- Figure HR 28: Pretransplant mortality rates among adults waitlisted for heart transplant by sex
- Figure HR 29: Pretransplant mortality rates among adults waitlisted for heart transplant by diagnosis
- Figure HR 30: Pretransplant mortality rates among adults waitlisted for heart transplant by metropolitan vs. non-metropolitan residence
- Figure HR 31: Pretransplant mortality rates among adults waitlisted for heart transplant by former medical urgency groups through October 17, 2018
- Figure HR 32: Pretransplant mortality rates among adults waitlisted for heart transplant by new medical urgency groups, October 18, 2018, through 2021
- Figure HR 33: Pretransplant mortality rates among adults waitlisted for heart transplant in 2021 by DSA
- Figure HR 34: Deaths within six months after removal among adult heart waitlist candidates, overall
- Figure HR 35: Deaths within six months after removal among adult heart waitlist candidates, by age
- Figure HR 36: Deaths within six months after removal among adult heart waitlist candidates, by status at removal
- Figure HR 37: Overall deceased heart donor count
- Figure HR 38: Deceased heart donor count by age
- Figure HR 39: Distribution of deceased heart donors by age
- Figure HR 40: Distribution of deceased heart donors by sex
- Figure HR 41: Distribution of deceased heart donors by race
- Figure HR 42: Cause of death among deceased heart donors
- Figure HR 43: Overall percent of hearts recovered for transplant and not transplanted
- Figure HR 44: Percent of hearts recovered for transplant and not transplanted by donor age
- Figure HR 45: Percent of hearts recovered for transplant and not transplanted by donor sex
- Figure HR 46: Percent of hearts recovered for transplant and not transplanted by donor race
- Figure HR 47: Percent of hearts recovered for transplant and not transplanted by donor hypertension status
- Figure HR 48: Percent of hearts recovered for transplant and not transplanted by donor BMI
- Figure HR 49: Percent of hearts recovered for transplant and not transplanted by donor cause of death
- Figure HR 50: Percent of hearts recovered for transplant and not transplanted, by donor risk of disease transmission
- Figure HR 51: Overall adult heart transplants
- Figure HR 52: Adult heart transplants by age
- Figure HR 53: Adult heart transplants by sex
- Figure HR 54: Adult heart transplants by race
- Figure HR 55: Adult heart transplants by diagnosis
- Figure HR 56: Adult heart transplants by medical urgency
- Figure HR 57: Induction agent use in adult heart transplant recipients
- Figure HR 58: Immunosuppression regimen use in adult heart transplant recipients
- Figure HR 59: Patient death among adult heart transplant recipients
- Figure HR 60: Patient survival among adult heart transplant recipients, 2014-2016, by age
- Figure HR 61: Patient survival among adult heart transplant recipients, 2014-2016, by race
- Figure HR 62: Patient survival among adult heart transplant recipients, 2014-2016, by diagnosis group
- Figure HR 63: Patient survival among adult heart transplant recipients, 2014-2016, by sex
- Figure HR 64: Patient survival among adult heart transplant recipients, 2014-2016, by VAD status
- Figure HR 65: Patient survival among adult heart transplant recipients, 2014-2016, by medical urgency
- Figure HR 66: Patient survival among adult heart transplant recipients, 2014-2016, by metropolitan vs. non-metropolitan recipient residence
- Figure HR 67: Incidence of acute rejection by 1 year posttransplant among adult heart transplant recipients by age
- Figure HR 68: Incidence of PTLD among adult heart transplant recipients by recipient EBV status at transplant, 2010-2016
- Figure HR 69: New pediatric candidates added to the heart transplant waiting list
- Figure HR 70: All pediatric candidates on the heart transplant waiting list
- Figure HR 71: Distribution of pediatric candidates waiting for heart transplant by age
- Figure HR 72: Distribution of pediatric candidates waiting for heart transplant by race
- Figure HR 73: Distribution of pediatric candidates waiting for heart transplant by diagnosis
- Figure HR 74: Distribution of pediatric candidates waiting for heart transplant by sex
- Figure HR 75: Distribution of pediatric candidates waiting for heart transplant by waiting time
- Figure HR 76: Distribution of pediatric candidates waiting for heart transplant by medical urgency
- Figure HR 77: Three-year outcomes for newly listed pediatric candidates waiting for heart transplant, 2016-2018
- Figure HR 78: Overall deceased donor heart transplant rates among pediatric waitlist candidates
- Figure HR 79: Deceased donor heart transplant rates among pediatric waitlist candidates by age
- Figure HR 80: Deceased donor heart transplant rates among pediatric waitlist candidates by race
- Figure HR 81: Deceased donor heart transplant rates among pediatric waitlist candidates by metropolitan vs. non-metropolitan residence
- Figure HR 82: Overall pretransplant mortality rates among pediatric candidates waitlisted for heart
- Figure HR 83: Pretransplant mortality rates among pediatric candidates waitlisted for heart transplant by age
- Figure HR 84: Pretransplant mortality rates among pediatric candidates waitlisted for heart transplant by race
- Figure HR 85: Pretransplant mortality rates among pediatrics waitlisted for heart transplant by diagnosis
- Figure HR 86: Pretransplant mortality rates among pediatrics waitlisted for heart transplant by medical urgency
- Figure HR 87: Pretransplant mortality rates among pediatric candidates waitlisted for heart transplant by metropolitan vs. non-metropolitan residence
- Figure HR 88: Overall pediatric heart transplants
- Figure HR 89: Pediatric heart transplants by recipient age
- Figure HR 90: Pediatric heart transplants by sex
- Figure HR 91: Pediatric heart transplants by race
- Figure HR 92: Pediatric heart transplants by diagnosis
- Figure HR 93: Pediatric heart transplants by medical urgency
- Figure HR 94: Induction agent use in pediatric heart transplant recipients
- Figure HR 95: Immunosuppression regimen use in pediatric heart transplant recipients
- Figure HR 96: Incidence of acute rejection by 1 year posttransplant among pediatric heart transplant recipients by age
- Figure HR 97: Incidence of PTLD among pediatric heart transplant recipients by recipient EBV status at transplant, 2010-2016
- Figure HR 98: Patient death among pediatric heart transplant recipients
- Figure HR 99: Overall patient survival among pediatric deceased donor heart transplant recipients, 2014-2016
- Figure HR 100: Patient survival among pediatric deceased donor heart transplant recipients, 2014-2016, by recipient age
List of Tables
- Table HR 1: Demographic characteristics of adults on the heart transplant waiting list on December 31, 2011, and December 31, 2021
- Table HR 2: Clinical characteristics of adults on the heart transplant waiting list on December 31, 2011, and December 31, 2021
- Table HR 3: Listing characteristics of adults on the heart transplant waiting list on December 31, 2011, and December 31, 2021
- Table HR 4: Heart transplant waitlist activity among adults
- Table HR 5: Removal reason among adult heart transplant candidates
- Table HR 6: Adult heart recipients on life support before transplant
- Table HR 7: Demographic characteristics of adult heart transplant recipients, 2011 and 2021
- Table HR 8: Clinical characteristics of adult heart transplant recipients, 2011 and 2021
- Table HR 9: Transplant characteristics of adult heart transplant recipients, 2011 and 2021
- Table HR 10: Demographic characteristics of pediatric candidates on the heart transplant waiting list on December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2021
- Table HR 11: Clinical characteristics of pediatric candidates on the heart transplant waiting list on December 31, 2011, and December 31, 2021
- Table HR 12: Listing characteristics of pediatric candidates on the heart transplant waiting list on December 31, 2011, and December 31, 2021
- Table HR 13: Heart transplant waitlist activity among pediatric candidates
- Table HR 14: Removal reason among pediatric heart transplant candidates
- Table HR 15: Pediatric heart recipients on life support before transplant
- Table HR 16: Demographic characteristics of pediatric heart transplant recipients, 2011 and 2021
- Table HR 17: Clinical characteristics of pediatric heart transplant recipients, 2011 and 2021
- Table HR 18: Transplant characteristics of pediatric heart transplant recipients, 2011 and 2021
Characteristic | 2011 | 2011 | 2021 | 2021 |
Age (years) | ||||
18-34 years | 320 | 11.1 | 365 | 11.9 |
35-49 | 651 | 22.6 | 680 | 22.1 |
50-64 | 1,427 | 49.5 | 1,465 | 47.7 |
65+ | 487 | 16.9 | 563 | 18.3 |
Sex | ||||
Male | 2,146 | 74.4 | 2,340 | 76.1 |
Female | 739 | 25.6 | 733 | 23.9 |
Race | ||||
White | 1,996 | 69.2 | 1,732 | 56.4 |
Black | 612 | 21.2 | 906 | 29.5 |
Asian | 62 | 2.1 | 93 | 3.0 |
Hispanic | 187 | 6.5 | 313 | 10.2 |
Other | 28 | 1.0 | 29 | 0.9 |
Geography | ||||
Metropolitan | 2,395 | 83.0 | 2,613 | 85.0 |
Non-metropolitan | 469 | 16.3 | 430 | 14.0 |
Missing | 21 | 0.7 | 30 | 1.0 |
Miles between candidate to center | ||||
<50 miles | 1,676 | 58.1 | 1,867 | 60.8 |
50-<100 | 477 | 16.5 | 479 | 15.6 |
100-<150 | 269 | 9.3 | 296 | 9.6 |
150-<250 | 247 | 8.6 | 216 | 7.0 |
250+ | 198 | 6.9 | 191 | 6.2 |
Missing | 18 | 0.6 | 24 | 0.8 |
All candidates | ||||
All candidates | 2,885 | 100.0 | 3,073 | 100.0 |
Characteristic | 2011 | 2011 | 2021 | 2021 |
Diagnosis | ||||
Coronary artery disease | 1,088 | 37.7 | 855 | 27.8 |
Cardiomyopathy | 1,429 | 49.5 | 1,826 | 59.4 |
Congenital disease | 151 | 5.2 | 167 | 5.4 |
Valvular disease | 54 | 1.9 | 31 | 1.0 |
Other/unknown | 157 | 5.4 | 194 | 6.3 |
NA | 6 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 |
Blood Type | ||||
A | 923 | 32.0 | 821 | 26.7 |
AB | 61 | 2.1 | 43 | 1.4 |
B | 305 | 10.6 | 311 | 10.1 |
O | 1,596 | 55.3 | 1,898 | 61.8 |
VAD status at listing | ||||
No VAD | 2,318 | 80.3 | 1,964 | 63.9 |
VAD | 535 | 18.5 | 1,096 | 35.7 |
Missing | 32 | 1.1 | 13 | 0.4 |
Urgency status for heart candidates | ||||
Status 1A | 202 | 7.0 | 0 | 0 |
Status 1B | 907 | 31.4 | 0 | 0 |
Status 2 | 963 | 33.4 | 0 | 0 |
Temporarily inactive | 813 | 28.2 | 669 | 21.8 |
Adult Status 1 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0.5 |
Adult Status 2 | 0 | 0 | 118 | 3.8 |
Adult Status 3 | 0 | 0 | 156 | 5.1 |
Adult Status 4 | 0 | 0 | 1,419 | 46.2 |
Adult Status 5 | 0 | 0 | 134 | 4.4 |
Adult Status 6 | 0 | 0 | 560 | 18.2 |
Adults listed under pediatric status | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
All candidates | ||||
All candidates | 2,885 | 100.0 | 3,073 | 100.0 |
Characteristic | 2011 | 2011 | 2021 | 2021 |
Previous transplant | ||||
No prior transplant | 2,770 | 96.0 | 2,982 | 97.0 |
Prior transplant | 115 | 4.0 | 91 | 3.0 |
Waiting time | ||||
<90 days | 541 | 18.8 | 594 | 19.3 |
3-<6 months | 384 | 13.3 | 340 | 11.1 |
6-<12 months | 518 | 18.0 | 581 | 18.9 |
1-<2 years | 628 | 21.8 | 604 | 19.7 |
2+ years | 814 | 28.2 | 954 | 31.0 |
All candidates | ||||
All candidates | 2,885 | 100.0 | 3,073 | 100.0 |
Waiting list state | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
Waiting list state | |||
Patients at start of year | 3,476 | 3,386 | 3,146 |
Patients added during year | 4,087 | 4,000 | 4,373 |
Patients removed during year | 4,177 | 4,240 | 4,446 |
Patients at end of year | 3,386 | 3,146 | 3,073 |
Removal reason | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
Removal reason | |||
Deceased donor transplant | 3,075 | 3,240 | 3,354 |
Patient died | 177 | 191 | 210 |
Patient refused transplant | 25 | 19 | 23 |
Improved, transplant not needed | 163 | 147 | 198 |
Too sick for transplant | 280 | 243 | 252 |
Other | 457 | 400 | 409 |
Life support type | 2018 | 2018 | 2021 | 2021 |
Life support type | ||||
Any life support | 2,431 | 81.9 | 2,574 | 76.3 |
Left ventricular assist device | 1,307 | 44.1 | 1,060 | 31.4 |
Intravenous inotropes | 1,015 | 34.2 | 1,268 | 37.6 |
Intra-aortic balloon pump | 278 | 9.4 | 930 | 27.6 |
Right ventricular assist device | 46 | 1.6 | 57 | 1.7 |
Extra corporeal membrane oxygenation | 58 | 2.0 | 229 | 6.8 |
Total artificial heart | 32 | 1.1 | 13 | 0.4 |
Ventilator | 34 | 1.1 | 78 | 2.3 |
Inhaled NO | 5 | 0.2 | 14 | 0.4 |
Prostaglandins | 5 | 0.2 | 5 | 0.1 |
Characteristic | 2011 | 2011 | 2021 | 2021 |
Recipient age (years) | ||||
18-34 years | 224 | 11.3 | 385 | 11.4 |
35-49 | 391 | 19.8 | 620 | 18.4 |
50-64 | 1,024 | 51.9 | 1,636 | 48.5 |
65+ | 335 | 17.0 | 731 | 21.7 |
Sex | ||||
Male | 1,420 | 71.9 | 2,484 | 73.7 |
Female | 554 | 28.1 | 888 | 26.3 |
Race | ||||
White | 1,340 | 67.9 | 1,986 | 58.9 |
Black | 409 | 20.7 | 842 | 25.0 |
Asian | 59 | 3.0 | 158 | 4.7 |
Hispanic | 157 | 8.0 | 354 | 10.5 |
Other | 9 | 0.5 | 32 | 0.9 |
Insurance | ||||
Private | 971 | 49.2 | 1,504 | 44.6 |
Medicare | 731 | 37.0 | 1,187 | 35.2 |
Medicaid | 194 | 9.8 | 485 | 14.4 |
Other/unknown | 78 | 4.0 | 196 | 5.8 |
Geography | ||||
Metropolitan | 1,675 | 84.9 | 2,824 | 83.7 |
Non-metropolitan | 273 | 13.8 | 446 | 13.2 |
Missing | 26 | 1.3 | 102 | 3.0 |
Miles between recipient to center | ||||
<50 miles | 1,219 | 61.8 | 1,999 | 59.3 |
50-<100 | 313 | 15.9 | 545 | 16.2 |
100-<150 | 182 | 9.2 | 275 | 8.2 |
150-<250 | 144 | 7.3 | 261 | 7.7 |
250+ | 98 | 5.0 | 199 | 5.9 |
Missing | 18 | 0.9 | 93 | 2.8 |
All recipients | ||||
All recipients | 1,974 | 100.0 | 3,372 | 100.0 |
Characteristic | 2011 | 2011 | 2021 | 2021 |
Diagnosis | ||||
Coronary artery disease | 750 | 38.0 | 995 | 29.5 |
Cardiomyopathy | 1,080 | 54.7 | 2,051 | 60.8 |
Congenital disease | 75 | 3.8 | 145 | 4.3 |
Valvular disease | 28 | 1.4 | 22 | 0.7 |
Other/unknown | 22 | 1.1 | 132 | 3.9 |
NA | 19 | 1.0 | 27 | 0.8 |
Blood Type | ||||
A | 803 | 40.7 | 1,279 | 37.9 |
AB | 108 | 5.5 | 158 | 4.7 |
B | 279 | 14.1 | 523 | 15.5 |
O | 784 | 39.7 | 1,412 | 41.9 |
VAD at transplant | ||||
VAD | 823 | 41.7 | 1,141 | 33.8 |
No VAD | 1,151 | 58.3 | 2,175 | 64.5 |
Missing | 0 | 0 | 56 | 1.7 |
CPRA | ||||
<1% | 1,035 | 52.4 | 1,693 | 50.2 |
1-<20% | 419 | 21.2 | 296 | 8.8 |
20-<80% | 361 | 18.3 | 350 | 10.4 |
80-<98% | 67 | 3.4 | 59 | 1.7 |
98-100% | 27 | 1.4 | 22 | 0.7 |
Missing | 65 | 3.3 | 952 | 28.2 |
Urgency status for heart recipients | ||||
Status 1A | 1,113 | 56.4 | 11 | 0.3 |
Status 1B | 731 | 37.0 | 5 | 0.1 |
Status 2 | 130 | 6.6 | 1 | 0.0 |
Adult Status 1 | 0 | 0 | 364 | 10.8 |
Adult Status 2 | 0 | 0 | 1,692 | 50.2 |
Adult Status 3 | 0 | 0 | 449 | 13.3 |
Adult Status 4 | 0 | 0 | 635 | 18.8 |
Adult Status 5 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 1.0 |
Adult Status 6 | 0 | 0 | 181 | 5.4 |
All recipients | ||||
All recipients | 1,974 | 100.0 | 3,372 | 100.0 |
Characteristic | 2011 | 2011 | 2021 | 2021 |
Waiting time | ||||
None | 57 | 2.9 | 176 | 5.2 |
<90 days | 919 | 46.6 | 2,140 | 63.5 |
3-<6 months | 316 | 16.0 | 361 | 10.7 |
6-<12 months | 324 | 16.4 | 261 | 7.7 |
1-<2 years | 235 | 11.9 | 188 | 5.6 |
2+ | 123 | 6.2 | 246 | 7.3 |
Previous transplant for recipients | ||||
Prior transplant | 80 | 4.1 | 98 | 2.9 |
No Prior transplant | 1,894 | 95.9 | 3,274 | 97.1 |
All recipients | ||||
All recipients | 1,974 | 100.0 | 3,372 | 100.0 |
Characteristic | 2011 | 2011 | 2021 | 2021 |
Age (years) | ||||
<1 year | 33 | 10.5 | 74 | 15.3 |
1-5 | 94 | 30.0 | 142 | 29.3 |
6-11 | 69 | 22.0 | 105 | 21.6 |
12-17 | 82 | 26.2 | 121 | 24.9 |
18+ | 35 | 11.2 | 43 | 8.9 |
Sex | ||||
Male | 188 | 60.1 | 276 | 56.9 |
Female | 125 | 39.9 | 209 | 43.1 |
Race | ||||
White | 183 | 58.5 | 239 | 49.3 |
Black | 57 | 18.2 | 92 | 19.0 |
Asian | 6 | 1.9 | 24 | 4.9 |
Hispanic | 64 | 20.4 | 114 | 23.5 |
Other | 3 | 1.0 | 16 | 3.3 |
Geography | ||||
Metropolitan | 270 | 86.3 | 407 | 83.9 |
Non-metropolitan | 36 | 11.5 | 73 | 15.1 |
Missing | 7 | 2.2 | 5 | 1.0 |
Miles between candidate to center | ||||
<50 miles | 160 | 51.1 | 239 | 49.3 |
50-<100 | 58 | 18.5 | 97 | 20.0 |
100-<150 | 27 | 8.6 | 62 | 12.8 |
150-<250 | 32 | 10.2 | 48 | 9.9 |
250+ | 29 | 9.3 | 34 | 7.0 |
Missing | 7 | 2.2 | 5 | 1.0 |
All candidates | ||||
All candidates | 313 | 100.0 | 485 | 100.0 |
Characteristic | 2011 | 2011 | 2021 | 2021 |
Pediatric diagnosis | ||||
Congenital defect | 145 | 46.3 | 311 | 64.1 |
Idiopathic dilated CM | 55 | 17.6 | 64 | 13.2 |
Familial dilated CM | 4 | 1.3 | 5 | 1.0 |
Idiopathic restricted CM | 23 | 7.3 | 12 | 2.5 |
Myocarditis | 9 | 2.9 | 5 | 1.0 |
Other/unknown | 77 | 24.6 | 88 | 18.1 |
Blood Type | ||||
A | 104 | 33.2 | 146 | 30.1 |
AB | 9 | 2.9 | 8 | 1.6 |
B | 24 | 7.7 | 52 | 10.7 |
O | 176 | 56.2 | 279 | 57.5 |
VAD status at listing | ||||
No VAD | 289 | 92.3 | 443 | 91.3 |
VAD | 12 | 3.8 | 41 | 8.5 |
Missing | 12 | 3.8 | 1 | 0.2 |
Urgency status for heart candidates | ||||
Status 1A | 76 | 24.3 | 114 | 23.5 |
Status 1B | 30 | 9.6 | 115 | 23.7 |
Status 2 | 72 | 23.0 | 111 | 22.9 |
Temporarily inactive | 135 | 43.1 | 145 | 29.9 |
All candidates | ||||
All candidates | 313 | 100.0 | 485 | 100.0 |
Characteristic | 2011 | 2011 | 2021 | 2021 |
Previous transplant | ||||
No prior transplant | 279 | 89.1 | 464 | 95.7 |
Prior transplant | 34 | 10.9 | 21 | 4.3 |
Waiting time | ||||
<90 days | 75 | 24.0 | 137 | 28.2 |
3-<6 months | 38 | 12.1 | 72 | 14.8 |
6-<12 months | 56 | 17.9 | 78 | 16.1 |
1-<2 years | 50 | 16.0 | 77 | 15.9 |
2+ years | 94 | 30.0 | 121 | 24.9 |
All candidates | ||||
All candidates | 313 | 100.0 | 485 | 100.0 |
Waiting list state | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
Waiting list state | |||
Patients at start of year | 393 | 414 | 443 |
Patients added during year | 694 | 673 | 703 |
Patients removed during year | 673 | 644 | 661 |
Patients at end of year | 414 | 443 | 485 |
Removal reason | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
Removal reason | |||
Deceased donor transplant | 520 | 475 | 505 |
Patient died | 54 | 57 | 46 |
Patient refused transplant | 3 | 2 | 3 |
Improved, transplant not needed | 43 | 48 | 40 |
Too sick for transplant | 29 | 33 | 33 |
Other | 24 | 29 | 34 |
Life support type | 2016 | 2016 | 2021 | 2021 |
Life support type | ||||
Any life support | 341 | 76.6 | 332 | 67.8 |
Left ventricular assist device | 102 | 22.9 | 168 | 34.3 |
Intravenous inotropes | 236 | 53.0 | 195 | 39.8 |
Intra-aortic balloon pump | 1 | 0.2 | 4 | 0.8 |
Right ventricular assist device | 14 | 3.1 | 28 | 5.7 |
Extra corporeal membrane oxygenation | 18 | 4.0 | 20 | 4.1 |
Total artificial heart | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.2 |
Ventilator | 78 | 17.5 | 36 | 7.3 |
Inhaled NO | 6 | 1.3 | 6 | 1.2 |
Prostaglandins | 18 | 4.0 | 8 | 1.6 |
Characteristic | 2011 | 2011 | 2021 | 2021 |
Recipient age (years) | ||||
<1 year | 110 | 29.3 | 111 | 22.7 |
1-5 | 88 | 23.5 | 107 | 21.8 |
6-11 | 62 | 16.5 | 88 | 18.0 |
12-17 | 115 | 30.7 | 184 | 37.6 |
Sex | ||||
Male | 190 | 50.7 | 278 | 56.7 |
Female | 185 | 49.3 | 212 | 43.3 |
Race | ||||
White | 207 | 55.2 | 261 | 53.3 |
Black | 80 | 21.3 | 97 | 19.8 |
Asian | 13 | 3.5 | 18 | 3.7 |
Hispanic | 68 | 18.1 | 98 | 20.0 |
Other | 7 | 1.9 | 16 | 3.3 |
Insurance | ||||
Private | 163 | 43.5 | 188 | 38.4 |
Medicare | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.2 |
Medicaid | 178 | 47.5 | 250 | 51.0 |
Other/unknown | 32 | 8.5 | 51 | 10.4 |
Geography | ||||
Metropolitan | 301 | 80.3 | 415 | 84.7 |
Non-metropolitan | 67 | 17.9 | 64 | 13.1 |
Missing | 7 | 1.9 | 11 | 2.2 |
Miles between recipient to center | ||||
<50 miles | 179 | 47.7 | 269 | 54.9 |
50-<100 | 62 | 16.5 | 86 | 17.6 |
100-<150 | 45 | 12.0 | 35 | 7.1 |
150-<250 | 51 | 13.6 | 47 | 9.6 |
250+ | 32 | 8.5 | 44 | 9.0 |
Missing | 6 | 1.6 | 9 | 1.8 |
All recipients | ||||
All recipients | 375 | 100.0 | 490 | 100.0 |
Characteristic | 2011 | 2011 | 2021 | 2021 |
Diagnosis | ||||
Congenital defect | 161 | 42.9 | 247 | 50.4 |
Idiopathic dilated CM | 117 | 31.2 | 113 | 23.1 |
Familial dilated CM | 20 | 5.3 | 31 | 6.3 |
Idiopathic restricted CM | 12 | 3.2 | 18 | 3.7 |
Myocarditis | 19 | 5.1 | 6 | 1.2 |
Other/unknown | 46 | 12.3 | 75 | 15.3 |
Blood Type | ||||
A | 148 | 39.5 | 175 | 35.7 |
AB | 19 | 5.1 | 23 | 4.7 |
B | 48 | 12.8 | 66 | 13.5 |
O | 160 | 42.7 | 226 | 46.1 |
VAD at transplant | ||||
VAD | 71 | 18.9 | 176 | 35.9 |
No VAD | 304 | 81.1 | 312 | 63.7 |
Missing | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.4 |
CPRA | ||||
<1% | 170 | 45.3 | 249 | 50.8 |
1-<20% | 61 | 16.3 | 42 | 8.6 |
20-<80% | 77 | 20.5 | 53 | 10.8 |
80-<98% | 16 | 4.3 | 18 | 3.7 |
98-100% | 7 | 1.9 | 5 | 1.0 |
Missing | 44 | 11.7 | 123 | 25.1 |
Urgency status for heart recipients | ||||
Status 1A | 335 | 89.3 | 401 | 81.8 |
Status 1B | 26 | 6.9 | 82 | 16.7 |
Status 2 | 14 | 3.7 | 7 | 1.4 |
All recipients | ||||
All recipients | 375 | 100.0 | 490 | 100.0 |
Characteristic | 2011 | 2011 | 2021 | 2021 |
Waiting time | ||||
None | 10 | 2.7 | 10 | 2.0 |
<90 days | 256 | 68.3 | 255 | 52.0 |
3-<6 months | 62 | 16.5 | 113 | 23.1 |
6-<12 months | 32 | 8.5 | 65 | 13.3 |
1-<2 years | 13 | 3.5 | 29 | 5.9 |
2+ | 2 | 0.5 | 18 | 3.7 |
ABO-Incompatible transplant | ||||
Compatible/Identical | 361 | 96.3 | 448 | 91.4 |
Incompatible | 14 | 3.7 | 42 | 8.6 |
Previous transplant for recipients | ||||
Prior transplant | 26 | 6.9 | 23 | 4.7 |
No Prior transplant | 349 | 93.1 | 467 | 95.3 |
All recipients | ||||
All recipients | 375 | 100.0 | 490 | 100.0 |