Skip To Main Content
Introduction

OPTN/SRTR 2015 Annual Data Report: Introduction

This introduction provides a brief overview of trends in waitlist and transplant activity for solid organs in the United States. Explanations of trends vary substantially by organ type, and details can be found in the respective organ-specific Annual Data Report chapters.

Trends in Kidney Transplantation

Last year (2015) was the first full year that the new kidney allocation system (KAS) was in effect, generating much interest in how the OPTN allocation changes would affect the numbers of listings and transplants. At year-end 2015, the number of active patients on the deceased donor kidney transplant waiting list increased by 0.6% compared with year-end 2014. The active kidney waiting list has grown every year over the past decade, 27.4% in total (Figure INT 1). The number of new candidates (active and inactive) added to the kidney waiting list declined by 3.9% in 2015 compared with 2014, but whether this 1-year change is a transient aberration or a new trend remains to be seen (Figure INT 3). The new allocation policy allows waiting time to accrue with the start of maintenance dialysis, prompting speculation that transplant programs might delay listing patients until their evaluations were completed, knowing that this would not disadvantage them once they were listed. Concerns that this practice would be widespread seem to have been unwarranted. Nevertheless, the small decline in new listings in 2015 may be in part a result of this new policy.

In 2015 compared with 2014, the number of kidney transplants increased by 4.4%, the largest 1-year increase in 12 years (Figure INT 5). The increase was mostly due to a 5.6% increase in deceased donor transplants; a small (1.6%) increase in living donor transplants also occurred. It was reassuring that the new KAS did not appear to have an overall negative effect on the number of kidney transplants. Unfortunately, the number of kidneys removed for transplant but not transplanted increased by 2.7% in 2015 compared with 2014 (Figure INT 7). Over the past decade, this number has increased by 15.6%, from 16.5% to 19.1%. Reasons cited include a general decline in the potential for long-term function of many deceased donor kidneys, as well as a putative aversion to risk taking on the part of transplant programs concerned about their public outcomes and regulatory scrutiny.

Trends in Pancreas Transplantation

Demand for pancreas transplants has declined dramatically. In the past decade, the year-end number of active candidates on the waiting list for simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant declined by 31.4%, and for pancreas alone or pancreas after kidney transplant by 50.8% (Figure INT 2). Numbers of new additions to these waiting lists declined similarly (Figure INT 4). Pancreas transplants have declined by 31.9% since 2006, likely reflecting reduced demand (Figure INT 6). In 2015, 25.1% of pancreata retrieved for transplant were not transplanted (Figure INT 7). The decline in pancreas transplants is probably due to a combination of factors, including improvements in non-invasive therapies for diabetes that obviate the need for pancreas transplant and the difficulty and potential complications of the transplant surgery.

Trends in Liver Transplantation

The second most common organ transplanted in the US is liver. Interestingly, the number of active liver transplant candidates on the waiting list has been slowly declining (Figure INT 1). From year-end 2014 to 2015, the number declined by 4.3%. The number of new additions (active and inactive) to the waiting list has increased by 10.5% over the past decade, and by 0.3% from 2014 to 2015 (Figure INT 3). The number of liver transplants has increased by 7.2% since 2006 (Figure INT 5). The 5.9% increase in liver transplants between 2014 and 2015 was the largest increase in 12 years (Figure INT 5). Most of it was due to an increase in deceased donor liver transplants (4.9%); however, the number of living donor liver transplants increased from 280 in 2014 to 359 in 2015 (28.2%). More liver transplants were performed in 2015 than in any year in the past 12 years. Since hepatitis C is the most common cause of end-stage liver disease requiring liver transplant, there is hope that new direct-acting antiviral agents will ultimately reduce the need for liver transplants. In the meantime, a shortage of livers for transplant remains. The rate of livers recovered for transplant but not transplanted has declined by 5.4% in the past decade and by 0.5% between 2014 and 2015 (Figure INT 7).

Trends in Intestine Transplantation

The number of intestine transplants has remained small. In 2015, 141 intestine transplants were performed. Between 2006 and 2015, the number of intestine transplants declined by 19.4%, from 175 to 141 (Figure INT 6). During this time, the number of candidates on the waiting list was virtually unchanged (Figure INT 2).

Trends in Heart Transplantation

The demand for heart transplants continues to grow steadily. In the past decade, the number of active candidates on the heart transplant waiting list at year-end increased by 130% (Figure INT 2). In this same time period, the number of new active and inactive candidates added to the list increased by 41.6% (Figure INT 4). Meanwhile, the number of heart transplants increased by 26.8% in the past decade, and by 5.2% between 2014 and 2015 (Figure INT 6). The number of hearts retrieved for transplant has not kept pace with the demand. The percentage of hearts recovered for transplant but not transplanted declined slightly (8.1%) from 2006 to 2015 (Figure INT 7). It is apparent that the growth in the waiting list has exceeded the growth in the number of transplants. This may in part reflect the proliferation of effective cardiac assist devices that allow patients to survive longer on the waiting list.

Trends in Lung Transplantation

Increases in numbers of lung transplants continue to exceed those for any other organ. Between 2006 and 2015, the number of lung transplants increased by 44.3% (Figure INT 6), and by 6.3% between 2014 and 2015. The number of active candidates on the lung transplant waiting list at year-end has grown by 14.7% over the past decade (Figure INT 2), while the number of active and inactive new additions to the waiting list has increased by 42.4% over the same time period (Figure INT 4). The number of lungs retrieved for transplant but not transplanted has increased, but remains relatively low, 6.7% in 2015 (Figure INT 7).

Summary

For the past 3 years in a row, the number of kidney transplants performed in the US has increased. Nevertheless, the waiting list continues to grow and despite this, almost 20% of deceased donor kidneys retrieved for transplant are not transplanted. Numbers of pancreas transplants continue to decline, likely due to improvements in diabetes management. The number of liver transplants is growing slowly, but has not met the demand from candidates added to the waiting list every year. This trend is likely to continue. In contrast, heart and lung transplants have shown the greatest growth in numbers over the past decade. Details behind these trends in solid organ transplantation can be found in this yearÓ³ Annual Data Report organ-specific chapters.

Figure List

Intro

Figure INT 1. Candidates active on the kidney or liver waiting list on December 31 of the year
Figure INT 2. Candidates active on the waiting list for organs other than isolated kidney or liver on December 31 of the year
Figure INT 3. New candidates added to the kidney or liver waiting list during the year
Figure INT 4. New candidates added to the waiting list during the year for organs other than isolated kidney or liver
Figure INT 5. Total counts of kidney or liver transplants
Figure INT 6. Total counts of transplants for organs other than isolated kidney or liver
Figure INT 7. Rates of organs recovered for transplant and not transplanted

A line plot for candidates active on the kidney or liver waiting list on december 31 of the year; the kidney category increases by 32.3% from 46.7 candidates (in thousands) at 2004 to 61.8 candidates (in thousands) at 2015; and the liver category is 12.7 candidates (in thousands) at 2004 and remains relatively constant with a value of 12.1 candidates (in thousands) at 2015.

Figure INT 1. Candidates active on the kidney or liver waiting list on December 31 of the year
Candidates concurrently listed at multiple centers are counted once. Those with concurrent listings and active at any program are considered active. Active status is assessed on December 31 of the year.


A line plot for candidates active on the waiting list for organs other than isolated kidney or liver on december 31 of the year; the kidney to pancreas category decreases by 41.4% from 1.7 candidates (in thousands) at 2004 to 1 candidates (in thousands) at 2015; the pancreas (pta+pak) category decreases by 61.8% from 0.7 candidates (in thousands) at 2004 to 0.3 candidates (in thousands) at 2015; the intestine category increases by 33.8% from 0.1 candidates (in thousands) at 2004 to 0.2 candidates (in thousands) at 2015; the heart category increases by 89.2% from 1.7 candidates (in thousands) at 2004 to 3.1 candidates (in thousands) at 2015; and the lung category decreases by 44.8% from 2.2 candidates (in thousands) at 2004 to 1.2 candidates (in thousands) at 2015.

Figure INT 2. Candidates active on the waiting list for organs other than isolated kidney or liver on December 31 of the year
Candidates concurrently listed at multiple centers are counted once. Those with concurrent listings and active at any program are considered active. PAK, pancreas after kidney; PTA, pancreas transplant alone. Active status is assessed on December 31 of the year.


A line plot for new candidates added to the kidney or liver waiting list during the year; the kidney category increases by 25.5% from 24.4 candidates (in thousands) at 2004 to 30.6 candidates (in thousands) at 2015; and the liver category increases by 13.4% from 10 candidates (in thousands) at 2004 to 11.3 candidates (in thousands) at 2015.

Figure INT 3. New candidates added to the kidney or liver waiting list during the year
A new candidate is one who first joined the list during the given year, without having been listed in a previous year. Previously listed candidates who underwent transplant and subsequently relisted are considered new. Candidates concurrently listed at multiple centers are counted once. Active and inactive patients are included; active status for kidney candidates is determined on day 7 after first listing.


A line plot for new candidates added to the waiting list during the year for organs other than isolated kidney or liver; the kidney to pancreas category decreases by 27.9% from 1.6 candidates (in thousands) at 2004 to 1.2 candidates (in thousands) at 2015; the pancreas (pta+pak) category decreases by 59.7% from 0.9 candidates (in thousands) at 2004 to 0.4 candidates (in thousands) at 2015; the intestine category is NA candidates (in thousands) at 2004 and is candidates (in thousands) at 2015; the heart category increases by 49.9% from 2.8 candidates (in thousands) at 2004 to 4.3 candidates (in thousands) at 2015; and the lung category increases by 30.5% from 1.9 candidates (in thousands) at 2004 to 2.5 candidates (in thousands) at 2015.

Figure INT 4. New candidates added to the waiting list during the year for organs other than isolated kidney or liver
A new candidate is one who first joined the list during the given year, without having been listed in a previous year. Previously listed candidates who underwent transplant and subsequently relisted are considered new. Candidates concurrently listed at multiple centers are counted once. Active and inactive patients are included. PAK, pancreas after kidney; PTA, pancreas transplant alone.


A line plot for total counts of kidney or liver transplants; the kidney category increases by 10.1% from 16.9 transplants (in thousands) at 2004 to 18.6 transplants (in thousands) at 2015; and the liver category increases by 15.5% from 6.2 transplants (in thousands) at 2004 to 7.1 transplants (in thousands) at 2015.

Figure INT 5. Total counts of kidney or liver transplants
Kidney: patients undergoing kidney or SPK transplant. Retransplants and multi-organ transplants are included. SPK, simultaneous pancreas-kidney.


A line plot for total counts of transplants for organs other than isolated kidney or liver; the pancreas category decreases by 36.2% from 1.5 transplants (in thousands) at 2004 to 0.9 transplants (in thousands) at 2015; the intestine category is 0.2 transplants (in thousands) at 2004 and remains relatively constant with a value of 0.1 transplants (in thousands) at 2015; the heart category increases by 37.2% from 2.1 transplants (in thousands) at 2004 to 2.8 transplants (in thousands) at 2015; and the lung category increases by 71.0% from 1.2 transplants (in thousands) at 2004 to 2.1 transplants (in thousands) at 2015.

Figure INT 6. Total counts of transplants for organs other than isolated kidney or liver
Pancreas: patients undergoing pancreas or SPK transplant. Heart: patients undergoing heart or heart-lung transplant. Lung: patients undergoing lung or heart-lung transplant. Retransplants and multi-organ transplants are included. SPK, simultaneous pancreas-kidney.


A line plot for rates of organs recovered for transplant and not transplanted; the kidney category increases by 16.3% from 16.4 percent at 2004 to 19.1 percent at 2015; the pancreas category is 25.2 percent at 2004 and remains relatively constant with a value of 25.1 percent at 2015; the liver category increases by 11.2% from 8.6 percent at 2004 to 9.6 percent at 2015; the intestine category decreases by 16.8% from 13.1 percent at 2004 to 10.9 percent at 2015; the heart category is 1 percent at 2004 and remains relatively constant with a value of 1.1 percent at 2015; and the lung category increases by 25.7% from 5.3 percent at 2004 to 6.7 percent at 2015.

Figure INT 7. Rates of organs recovered for transplant and not transplanted
Percentage of organs not transplanted out of all organs recovered for transplant. Kidneys recovered en-bloc are counted once, and kidneys recovered separately are counted twice.